The team needed delivery capacity for a quarter, not a permanent hiring commitment.
Separate platform usage from the people needed to execute.
Scenario context
UK agency delivery operation · 60-role portfolio · 12-week peak-demand period
The problem
Several clients release requirements together. The agency needs additional sourcing, candidate coordination and assessment capacity for a bounded period, while retaining ownership of client relationships and submissions.
The proposed approach
- Model 60 roles at 12 human sourcing/coordination hours per role and 240 completed expert interviews at one hour each.
- Add 60 hours of account coordination to the service scope: a total 1,020-hour planned workload.
- Assume the internal team can contribute 480 hours. Model the remaining 540 hours as on-demand delivery, with distinct responsibility and pricing for each service.
Where people stay involved
Humans deliver sourcing, coordination and expert interviews. The platform organises records, screening and evidence. The agency approves delivery and owns client commitments.
What the model calculates
The model identifies a 540-hour external capacity gap, equivalent to 45 hours per week over 12 weeks. It is work to commission and manage, not hours eliminated by AI.
What it does not establish
No saving against permanent staff cost or revenue uplift is claimed. All hours, role counts and completed-interview requirements are planning assumptions; availability and rates need a scoped proposal.
Book a demo · HirePlusPlus home